Distinguished Administrator Rubric
A WKCTC Awards Team will review the administrator applications after Friday, January 24, 2025. Winners will be selected by the highest score from the rubric (shown below) created for this category based on review of the application information provided.
To see the complete rubric, be sure to scroll to the right and down.
| Trait | 5 Points | 3 Points | 1 Point | 0 Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CV |
Is it complete. (Please see the bullets under the CV heading in the Distinguished Administrator Nominee application.) | Examples of certificates, leadership, awards and professional development. | If you have five of the nine bullets under the CV heading in the Distinguished Administrator Nominee application. |
If CV has bare minimum |
| Leadership in the Community, School, and District |
Applicant clearly describes their contribution in leading and developing efforts to engage state, national, or community groups; to institutes and implement district/school programs and to support student success. |
Applicant clearly describes two of the three aspects of their leadership in the community, school and district. |
Applicant clearly describes one of the three aspects of their leadership in the community, school and district. | Application does not clearly describe their leadership. |
| Improvement Project |
Amble description of a project or initiative that helped improve overall school or district culture. Applicant's role in the project is clearly communicated. Applicant clearly shows their own role in the project as well as how they involved others. |
Clarity of the project's contribution to the overall improvement of school or district culture and the applicant's role is weak. |
Either the applicant's role or who others were involved is missing. | It is not clear how this project contributions to the improvement of school or district culture. |
| Major Educational Issue |
Applicant clearly outlines a major educational issues; describes its importance to the applicant and their role in helping to address the issue. |
Either the issue is poorly described, or the importance is not communicated or the applicant's role in addressing the issue is missing. |
Only one aspect of the major educational issue addressed. | It isn't clear out the applicant is providing significant contribution in addressing the issue. |
